Posted by bibs on July 16, 1999 at 14:20:34:
In Reply to: Re: Derrick Cameron posted by JERRY BELL on July 09, 1999 at 06:03:32:
:
: : I guess I shouldn't even have given that idiot the satisfaction of responding to his braindead message. He just really ticked me off. (Still does)
: : Too bad people like dear Derrick are cropping up all over the woodwork. It's a crying shame that someone like that has access to a computer, since his IQ obviously goes back to the time before they invented the wheel.
: : So Derrick, if you read this, go back to chasing cars and quit bothering us.
: : On the other hand, I'm sure you can find yourself a website for self-proclaimed morons.
: : GO THERE AND STAY THERE!
: : If you don't like what I have to say - Too bad.
: : And you can keep any further coments to yourself, because you've already made your point and nothing could enhance your reputation any more than what you already revealed about your lovely personality.
: : I'm sure there are plenty of things you'd like to say to me right about now. Save it. For one, you don't have the vocabulary and two: I don't care.
: : I've made my point. You got a problem with that? Bite me!
: SHEESH! YOU'VE GOT SOME SERIOUS ANGER-MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS IF A COMPLETE STRANGER'S USE OF THE "F" WORD UPSETS YOU TO SUCH A DEGREE. CONTINUING TO FOCUS NEGATIVE ENERGY (ANGER, MORAL INDIGNATION, INTOLERANCE) ON SUCH A TRIVIAL THING AS THE USE OF A "CURSE" WORD, IS UNHEALTHY. MR. CAMERON SINCERELY EXPRESSED HIS JOY UPON FINDING THIS SITE. THE ONLY REASON HIS CHOICE OF LANGUAGE WAS "INAPPROPRIATE" IS BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU PERPETUATE THE IDEA THAT IT IS SO. IT IS YOUR BELIEF THAT "FUCK" IS A "DIRTY" WORD. WOULD THE USE OF "COPULATION" BE ACCEPTABLE. OR PERHAPS IT WAS THE USE OF "FUCK" AS AN ADJECTIVE (NOT THAT ITS EVEN GRAMATICALLY OR CONTEXTUALLLY IMPROPER) THAT SO OFFENDED YOUR SUPERIOR INTELLECT. WHATEVER THE CASE, YOUR CLOSING REMARK OF, "BITE ME!", IS EVERY BIT AS CRUDE AND SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE AS THE MORE MALIGNED "FUCK". AS I STATED EARLIER, MR. CAMERON WAS SINCERELY EXPRESSING HIS JOY AT FINDING THIS SITE. THAT'S A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION, REGARDLESS OF HIS (ARGUABLY) JUVENILE CHOICE OF WORDS. I DOUBT HE DELIBERATELY SET OUT TO OFFEND ANYONE. YOU, HOWEVER, INTENTIONALLY INSULTED HIS CHARACTER, INTELLECT, AND VERY STATUS AS A HUMAN BEING (REFERRING TO HIM VARIOUSLY AS A MORON, SUBSTANCE ABUSER, AND DOG {A GREAT INJUSTICE TO JACK, MIGHT I ADD}) IN NOT ONE, BUT TWO, POSTINGS). THAT IS A NEGATIVE CONTRIBUTION. LIGHTEN UP, AND USE THAT SOAP BOX FOR STORING YOUR IRRATIONAL ANGER. SORRY TO EVERYONE ELSE FOR CONTINUING OFF THE SUBJECT OF WHAT THIS BOARD IS ALL ABOUT, BUT, AFTER ALL, ONE GOOD LECTURE DESERVES ANOTHER, AND SINCE MR./MS BIBS HAS DENIED MR. CAMERON THE PERMISSION TO RESPOND, I, HUMBLY, TOOK IT UPON MYSELF TO CHAMPION HIS CAUSE. MOM WOULD BE PROUD!
: ---JERRY
: P.S. YOU MIS-SPELLED "COMMENTS" GENIUS.
Thanks for the correction, eh. If you look real hard you might find a few more spelling mistakes.
I do have a temper and sometimes it feels good to get something of my chest.
I suppose we each have our own views on what's cool and what's not.
So. Now what are YOU doing to get Tales of the Gold Monkey back on TV or out on tapes?
Despite what you might think, I'm also using my energy productively. Like getting the message across to places like Columbia House that the show would make a good seller. If more people would ask about GM, they might even try to do something about it.
I've called a few places that never even heard of the show.
And if in fact your friend just expressed his excitement and delight at finding the web site, get him to call too.